5.12汶川地震堰塞湖危险性应急评估
何思明; 崔鹏; 程尊兰; 陈晓清; 游勇; 张小刚
刊名地学前缘
2008
卷号15期号:4页码:244-249
关键词汶川地震 堰塞湖 危险性应急评估
其他题名Emergency risk assessment of dammed lakes caused by the Wenchuan earthquake on May 12,2008
合作状况其它
中文摘要5.12汶川地震诱发了33处堰塞湖,威胁下游居民安全。根据收集数据情况,选择堰塞湖的坝高、最大库容和坝体结构作为分级指标,建立了单个堰塞湖溃决危险性评估方法,对21个重点堰塞湖进行应急危险性评估,初步评估为1个处于极高危险、7个处于高危险、5个处于中危险、8个处于低危险。考虑同一流域堰塞湖群的联动效应,建立了流域堰塞湖危险性评估方法,相应提高部分堰塞湖的危险等级。为了方便排险安排,给出了高危险堰塞湖的危险性次序,从高到低依次有唐家山、老鹰岩、南坝、小岗剑上、肖家桥、唐家湾、罐子铺和岩羊滩。由于评估时间紧迫,最后提出了此次评估中存在的问题,并提出了改进建议。
英文摘要The 33 dammed lakes induced by the Wenchuan earthquake on May 12 are threatening thousands of people downstream.According to the field survey, we choose the dam height, the largest reservoir capacity and the dam body structure of dammed lakes as the indexes.We set up a hazard assessment method for the bursting of a single dammed lake and take an emergency risk assessment of the 21 key dammed lakes.The result shows that the number of dammed lakes whose risk degree is very high, high, medium and low respectively is 1, 7, 5 and 8 correspondingly.Considering the interaction of a group of dammed lakes along the same river, we have set up the hazard assessment method of dammed lakes for a drainage area and re-assessed some of dammed lakes accordingly.The hazard order of high-risk dammed lakes, from high to low, is Tangjiashan, Laoyingyan, Nanba, Xiaogangjianshang, Xiaojiaqiao, Tangjiawan, Guanzipu and Yanyangtan.Finally, the problems involved in the assessment are indicated for further research.
资助信息国家自然科学基金资助项目(40501008);中国科学院西部之光人才培养计划项目
语种中文
公开日期2010-12-07
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/2745]  
专题成都山地灾害与环境研究所_成都山地所知识仓储(2009年以前)
成都山地灾害与环境研究所_山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
何思明,崔鹏,程尊兰,等. 5.12汶川地震堰塞湖危险性应急评估[J]. 地学前缘,2008,15(4):244-249.
APA 何思明,崔鹏,程尊兰,陈晓清,游勇,&张小刚.(2008).5.12汶川地震堰塞湖危险性应急评估.地学前缘,15(4),244-249.
MLA 何思明,et al."5.12汶川地震堰塞湖危险性应急评估".地学前缘 15.4(2008):244-249.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace