Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study
WU Ying-Hsin ; LIU Ko-Fei ; CHEN Yi-Chin
刊名Journal of Mountain Science
2013-04
卷号10期号:2页码:293-304
关键词Debris flow assessment Program comparison FLO-2D Debris-2D
通讯作者LIU Ko-Fei
英文摘要Numerical simulation has been widely applied to the assessment of debris flow hazards. In East Asia and especially Taiwan, the most widely used numerical programs are FLO-2D and Debris-2D. Although these two programs are applied to the same engineering tasks, they are different in many aspects. These two programs were compared according to their fundamental theories, input and output data, computational algorithms and results. Using both programs, the simulations of a real debris flow with abundant granular material induced by landslides at Xinfa village in southern Taiwan are performed for comparison. The simulation results show that Debris-2D gives better assessment in hazard area delineating and flow depth predicting. Therefore, Debris-2D is better for simulation of granular debris flows.
收录类别SCI
语种英语
公开日期2013-04-26
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://192.168.143.20:8080/handle/131551/5219]  
专题成都山地灾害与环境研究所_Journal of Mountain Science _Journal of Mountain Science-2013_Vol10 No.2
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
WU Ying-Hsin,LIU Ko-Fei,CHEN Yi-Chin. Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2013,10(2):293-304.
APA WU Ying-Hsin,LIU Ko-Fei,&CHEN Yi-Chin.(2013).Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study.Journal of Mountain Science,10(2),293-304.
MLA WU Ying-Hsin,et al."Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study".Journal of Mountain Science 10.2(2013):293-304.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace