Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety among three surgical approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. | |
Yang Pinglin; Zang Quanjin; Kang Jian; Li Haopeng; He Xijing | |
刊名 | European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
![]() |
2016 | |
卷号 | 25页码:3862-3874 |
关键词 | Combined anterior and posterior approach Meta-analysis Spinal tuberculosis Anterior approach Posterior approach |
ISSN号 | 1432-0932 |
URL标识 | 查看原文 |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
URI标识 | http://www.corc.org.cn/handle/1471x/2954968 |
专题 | 西安交通大学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Yang Pinglin,Zang Quanjin,Kang Jian,et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety among three surgical approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis.[J]. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society,2016,25:3862-3874. |
APA | Yang Pinglin,Zang Quanjin,Kang Jian,Li Haopeng,&He Xijing.(2016).Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety among three surgical approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis..European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society,25,3862-3874. |
MLA | Yang Pinglin,et al."Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety among three surgical approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis.".European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 25(2016):3862-3874. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论