CORC  > 上海财经大学  > 上海财经大学
REPUTATION, TRUST, AND REBATES: HOW ONLINE AUCTION MARKETS CAN IMPROVE THEIR FEEDBACK MECHANISMS
Li, Lingfang (Ivy)
刊名JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
2010-06
卷号19期号:2页码:303-331
ISSN号1058-6407
英文摘要Reputation systems constitute an important institution, helping sustain trust in online auction markets. However, only half of buyers leave feedback after transactions, and nearly all feedback is positive. In this paper, I propose a mechanism whereby sellers can provide rebates (not necessarily in monetary form) to buyers contingent upon buyers' provision of reports. Using a game theoretical model, I show how the mechanism can increase unbiased reporting. There exists a pooling equilibrium where both good and bad sellers choose the rebate option, even though their true types are revealed through feedback. The mechanism also induces bad sellers to improve the quality of the contract.
WOS研究方向Business & Economics
语种英语
出版者WILEY-BLACKWELL
WOS记录号WOS:000277272900002
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://10.2.47.112/handle/2XS4QKH4/2385]  
专题上海财经大学
通讯作者Li, Lingfang (Ivy)
作者单位Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Li, Lingfang . REPUTATION, TRUST, AND REBATES: HOW ONLINE AUCTION MARKETS CAN IMPROVE THEIR FEEDBACK MECHANISMS[J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY,2010,19(2):303-331.
APA Li, Lingfang .(2010).REPUTATION, TRUST, AND REBATES: HOW ONLINE AUCTION MARKETS CAN IMPROVE THEIR FEEDBACK MECHANISMS.JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY,19(2),303-331.
MLA Li, Lingfang ."REPUTATION, TRUST, AND REBATES: HOW ONLINE AUCTION MARKETS CAN IMPROVE THEIR FEEDBACK MECHANISMS".JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 19.2(2010):303-331.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace