Retrospective and Prospective Benefit-Cost Analyses of U.S. Anti-Smoking Policies | |
Jin, Lawrence1; Kenkel, Don1,2; Liu, Feng3; Wang, Hua1 | |
刊名 | JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
![]() |
2015-03 | |
卷号 | 6期号:1页码:154-186 |
关键词 | addiction behavioral economics smoking |
ISSN号 | 2194-5888 |
DOI | 10.1017/bca.2014.1 |
英文摘要 | Regulatory policies designed to improve societal welfare by "nudging" consumers to make better choices are increasingly popular. The application of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) to this sort of regulation confronts difficult theoretical and applied issues. In this analysis we contribute a worked example of behavioral BCA of U.S. anti-smoking policies. Our conceptual framework extends the standard market-based approach to BCA to allow for individual failures to make lifetime-utility-maximizing choices of cigarette consumption. We discuss how our market-based approach compares to the health benefits approach and the "consumer surplus offset" controversy in recent BCAs of several health-related regulations. We use a dynamic population model to make counterfactual simulations of smoking prevalence rates and cigarette demand over time. In our retrospective BCA the simulation results imply that the overall impact of anti-smoking policies from 1964 to 2010 is to reduce the total cigarette consumption by 28%. At a discount rate of 3% the 1964-present value of the consumer benefits from anti-smoking policies through 2010 is estimated to be $573 billion ($2010). Although we are unable to develop a hard estimate of the policies( costs, we discuss evidence that suggests the consumer benefits substantially outweigh the costs. We then turn to a prospective BCA of future anti-smoking Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. At a discount rate of 3%, the 2010-present value of the consumer benefits 30 years into the future from a simulated FDA tobacco regulation is estimated to be $100 billion. However, the nature of potential FDA tobacco regulations suggests that they might impose additional costs on consumers that make it less clear that the net benefits of the regulations will be positive. |
WOS研究方向 | Business & Economics |
语种 | 英语 |
出版者 | CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000214787300006 |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://10.2.47.112/handle/2XS4QKH4/1578] ![]() |
专题 | 上海财经大学 |
通讯作者 | Kenkel, Don |
作者单位 | 1.Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA; 2.NBER, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA; 3.Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jin, Lawrence,Kenkel, Don,Liu, Feng,et al. Retrospective and Prospective Benefit-Cost Analyses of U.S. Anti-Smoking Policies[J]. JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS,2015,6(1):154-186. |
APA | Jin, Lawrence,Kenkel, Don,Liu, Feng,&Wang, Hua.(2015).Retrospective and Prospective Benefit-Cost Analyses of U.S. Anti-Smoking Policies.JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS,6(1),154-186. |
MLA | Jin, Lawrence,et al."Retrospective and Prospective Benefit-Cost Analyses of U.S. Anti-Smoking Policies".JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS 6.1(2015):154-186. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论