Comparability of estimating energy rebound effect should be based on uniform mechanism and benchmark: A reply to Du and Lin

doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.001

CORC > 上海财经大学 > 上海财经大学

	Comparability of estimating energy rebound effect should be based on uniform mechanism and benchmark: A reply to Du and Lin
	Li, Chengyu 1; Shao, Shuai 1; Yang, Lili 2; Yu, Mingliang 3
刊名	ENERGY POLICY
	2016-04
卷号	91 页码:60-63
关键词	Energy rebound effect Logic error Rigorousness Comparability Rationality
ISSN号	0301-4215
DOI	10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.001
英文摘要	Du and Lin (2015) argued that the estimation model of the economy-wide energy rebound effect proposed by Shao et al. (2014) should be revised and provided an alternative approach, which they considered to be more consistent with the definition of the rebound effect. However, in this comment, we do not find a valid correction or modification to our original model, because their criticism logic does not originate from the corresponding mechanism in Shao et al. (2014), and their estimation formula has a different benchmark with ours. Moreover, their data samples were also different from ours, generating the incomparable results, and there are some irrational results in the comment. Even based on different estimation formulas in the two studies and using the same estimation method and data sample, the comparison results show that the problem of the estimation formula in our previous study which they claimed does not really exist. We argue that this comment is not consistent with the principle of the rebound effect. Actually, their work can be only regarded as proposing an alternative approach for the estimate of the rebound effect. Therefore, their argument is not enough to overturn our previous study. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
WOS研究方向	Business & Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
语种	英语
出版者	ELSEVIER SCI LTD
WOS记录号	WOS:000371550300007
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://10.2.47.112/handle/2XS4QKH4/1315]
专题	上海财经大学
通讯作者	Shao, Shuai
作者单位	1.Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Urban & Reg Sci, Inst Finance & Econ Res, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China; 2.Shanghai Finance Univ, Sch Int Business Management, Inst Guogou & Free Trade Zone Finance, Shanghai 201209, Peoples R China; 3.Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat Management & Engn, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Li, Chengyu,Shao, Shuai,Yang, Lili,et al. Comparability of estimating energy rebound effect should be based on uniform mechanism and benchmark: A reply to Du and Lin[J]. ENERGY POLICY,2016,91:60-63.
APA	Li, Chengyu,Shao, Shuai,Yang, Lili,&Yu, Mingliang.(2016).Comparability of estimating energy rebound effect should be based on uniform mechanism and benchmark: A reply to Du and Lin.ENERGY POLICY,91,60-63.
MLA	Li, Chengyu,et al."Comparability of estimating energy rebound effect should be based on uniform mechanism and benchmark: A reply to Du and Lin".ENERGY POLICY 91(2016):60-63.