Confounding, homogeneity and collapsibility for causal effects in epidemiologic studies | |
Geng, Z ; Guo, JH ; Lau, TS ; Fung, WK | |
2001 | |
关键词 | causal effect collapsibility confounding effect modification homogeneity CONTINGENCY-TABLES INTERVAL ESTIMATION RELATIVE RISK DIFFERENCE INFERENCE TESTS |
英文摘要 | Detection of confounding and confounders is important for observational studies, and especially so for epidemiologic studies. Miettinen and Cook (1981) derived two criteria for detecting confounders. Using a model, Wickramaratne and Holford (1987) proved that the two criteria are necessary but not sufficient conditions for confounders. We take uniform nonconfounding to mean there is no confounding at a coarse-subpopulation-level obtained by pooling any number of subpopulations. We discuss the necessity and sufficiency of the two criteria for uniform nonconfounding. The concepts of homogeneity and collapsibility for causal effects are also defined, and the relation among confounding, homogeneity and collapsibility is discussed. We show that the common causal effect over all fine subpopulations is just the causal effect of the whole population.; Statistics & Probability; SCI(E); 9; ARTICLE; 1; 63-75; 11 |
语种 | 英语 |
出处 | SCI |
出版者 | statistica sinica |
内容类型 | 其他 |
源URL | [http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/389191] ![]() |
专题 | 数学科学学院 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Geng, Z,Guo, JH,Lau, TS,et al. Confounding, homogeneity and collapsibility for causal effects in epidemiologic studies. 2001-01-01. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论