Comparison of multinomial logistic regression and logistic regression: which is more efficient in allocating land use? | |
Lin, Yingzhi1; Deng, Xiangzheng2,3; Li, Xing1; Ma, Enjun1 | |
刊名 | FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE
![]() |
2014-12-01 | |
卷号 | 8期号:4页码:512-523 |
关键词 | Multinomial Logistic Regression Land Use Change Logistic Regression Land Use Suitability Land Use Allocation |
文献子类 | Article |
英文摘要 | Spatially explicit simulation of land use change is the basis for estimating the effects of land use and cover change on energy fluxes, ecology and the environment. At the pixel level, logistic regression is one of the most common approaches used in spatially explicit land use allocation models to determine the relationship between land use and its causal factors in driving land use change, and thereby to evaluate land use suitability. However, these models have a drawback in that they do not determine/allocate land use based on the direct relationship between land use change and its driving factors. Consequently, a multinomial logistic regression method was introduced to address this flaw, and thereby, judge the suitability of a type of land use in any given pixel in a case study area of the Jiangxi Province, China. A comparison of the two regression methods indicated that the proportion of correctly allocated pixels using multinomial logistic regression was 92.98%, which was 8.47% higher than that obtained using logistic regression. Paired t-test results also showed that pixels were more clearly distinguished by multinomial logistic regression than by logistic regression. In conclusion, multinomial logistic regression is a more efficient and accurate method for the spatial allocation of land use changes. The application of this method in future land use change studies may improve the accuracy of predicting the effects of land use and cover change on energy fluxes, ecology, and environment. |
WOS关键词 | CHINA ; LANDSCAPE ; DETERMINANTS ; DEGRADATION ; ABANDONMENT ; POPULATION ; SIMULATION ; DYNAMICS ; CLIMATE ; MODELS |
语种 | 英语 |
出版者 | SPRINGER |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000345389600005 |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/68451] ![]() |
专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
通讯作者 | Lin, Yingzhi |
作者单位 | 1.China Univ Geosci, Sch Math & Phys, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Chinese Agr Policy, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lin, Yingzhi,Deng, Xiangzheng,Li, Xing,et al. Comparison of multinomial logistic regression and logistic regression: which is more efficient in allocating land use?[J]. FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE,2014,8(4):512-523. |
APA | Lin, Yingzhi,Deng, Xiangzheng,Li, Xing,&Ma, Enjun.(2014).Comparison of multinomial logistic regression and logistic regression: which is more efficient in allocating land use?.FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE,8(4),512-523. |
MLA | Lin, Yingzhi,et al."Comparison of multinomial logistic regression and logistic regression: which is more efficient in allocating land use?".FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE 8.4(2014):512-523. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论