When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth centuryboundary level is stratigraphically optimal
Oreskes,N(Oreskes, Naomi)[24]; An,ZS(An,Zhisheng)[23]; Wolfe,AP(Wolfe,Alexander P)[22]; Wing,SL(Wing,Scott L)[21]; Wagreich,M(Wagreich,Michael)[20]; Vidas,D(Vidas,Davor)[19]; Syvitski,JPM(Syvitski,James P.M)[18]; Summerhayes,C(Summerhayes,Colin)[17]; Steffen,W(Steffen,Will)[16]; Richter,D(Richter,Daniel)[15]
刊名Quaternary International
2015-10-05
卷号383期号:2015页码:196-203
关键词Anthropocene Stratigraphy GSSP GSSA
DOI10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045
文献子类期刊论文
英文摘要We evaluate the boundary of the Anthropocene geological time interval as an epoch, since it is useful to have a consistent temporal definition for this increasingly used unit, whether the presently informal term is eventually formalized or not. Of the three main levels suggested – an ‘early Anthropocene’ level some thousands of years ago; the beginning of the Industrial Revolution at ∼1800 CE (Common Era); and the ‘Great Acceleration’ of the mid-twentieth century – current evidence suggests that the last of these has the most pronounced and globally synchronous signal. A boundary at this time need not have a Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP or ‘golden spike’) but can be defined by a Global Standard Stratigraphic Age (GSSA), i.e. a point in time of the human calendar. We propose an appropriate boundary level here to be the time of the world's first nuclear bomb explosion, on July 16th 1945 at Alamogordo, New Mexico; additional bombs were detonated at the average rate of one every 9.6 days until 1988 with attendant worldwide fallout easily identifiable in the chemostratigraphic record. Hence, Anthropocene deposits would be those that may include the globally distributed primary artificial radionuclide signal, while also being recognized using a wide range of other stratigraphic criteria. This suggestion for the Holocene–Anthropocene boundary may ultimately be superseded, as the Anthropocene is only in its early phases, but it should remain practical and effective for use by at least the current generation of scientists.
语种英语
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.ieecas.cn/handle/361006/9640]  
专题地球环境研究所_黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室(2010~)
作者单位1.Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
2.The Institute of the Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 10 Fenghui South Road, Xi'an High-Tech Zone, Xi'an 710075, China;
3.Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada;
4.Dept. of Paleobiology, NHB121, PO Box 37012, Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA;
5.Department of Geodynamics and Sedimentology, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
6.Marine Affairs and Law of the Sea Programme, The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway;
7.University of Colorado-Boulder Campus, Box 545, Boulder, CO 80309-0545, USA;
8.Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge University, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER, UK;
9.The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia;
10.Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA;
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Oreskes,N,An,ZS,Wolfe,AP,et al. When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth centuryboundary level is stratigraphically optimal[J]. Quaternary International,2015,383(2015):196-203.
APA Oreskes,N.,An,ZS.,Wolfe,AP.,Wing,SL.,Wagreich,M.,...&Zalasiewicz,J.(2015).When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth centuryboundary level is stratigraphically optimal.Quaternary International,383(2015),196-203.
MLA Oreskes,N,et al."When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth centuryboundary level is stratigraphically optimal".Quaternary International 383.2015(2015):196-203.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace