A comparison of two Stokes ice sheet models applied to the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for plan view models (MISMIP3d)
Zhang, Tong1,3,4,5; Price, Stephen2; Ju, Lili3,4; Leng, Wei6; Brondex, Julien7; Durand, Gael7; Gagliardini, Olivier7
刊名CRYOSPHERE
2017-01-25
卷号11期号:1页码:179-190
ISSN号1994-0416
DOI10.5194/tc-11-179-2017
英文摘要We present a comparison of the numerics and simulation results for two "full" Stokes ice sheet models, FELIX-S (Leng et al., 2012) and Elmer/Ice (Gagliardini et al., 2013). The models are applied to the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for plan view models (MIS-MIP3d). For the diagnostic experiment (P75D) the two models give similar results (<2% difference with respect to along-flow velocities) when using identical geometries and computational meshes, which we interpret as an indication of inherent consistencies and similarities between the two models. For the standard (Stnd), P75S, and P75R prognostic experiments, we find that FELIX-S (Elmer/Ice) grounding lines are relatively more retreated (advanced), results that are consistent with minor differences observed in the diagnostic experiment results and that we show to be due to different choices in the implementation of basal boundary conditions in the two models. While we are not able to argue for the relative favorability of either implementation, we do show that these differences decrease with increasing horizontal (i.e., both along-and across-flow) grid resolution and that grounding-line positions for FELIX-S and Elmer/Ice converge to within the estimated truncation error for Elmer/Ice. Stokes model solutions are often treated as an accuracy metric in model intercomparison experiments, but computational cost may not always allow for the use of model resolution within the regime of asymptotic convergence. In this case, we propose that an alternative estimate for the uncertainty in the grounding-line position is the span of grounding-line positions predicted by multiple Stokes models.
资助项目Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program - US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Biological and Environmental Research ; National Basic Research Program (973) of China[2013CBA01804] ; National Basic Research Program (973) of China[CHINARE2016] ; US National Science Foundation[DMS-1215659] ; National 863 Project of China[2012AA01A309] ; National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) through the SUMER[Blanc SIMI 6-2012] ; Office of Science of the US Department of Energy[DE-AC02-05CH11231] ; Center for Global Sea-Level Change at New York University Abu Dhabi
WOS研究方向Physical Geography ; Geology
语种英语
出版者COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
WOS记录号WOS:000395179400002
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.amss.ac.cn/handle/2S8OKBNM/24714]  
专题中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院
通讯作者Price, Stephen
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather LASW, Beijing, Peoples R China
2.Los Alamos Natl Lab, Fluid Dynam & Solid Mech Grp, Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA
3.Univ South Carolina, Dept Math, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
4.Univ South Carolina, Interdisciplinary Math Inst, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
5.Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Cryospher Sci, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
6.Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Sci & Engn Comp, Beijing, Peoples R China
7.Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, IGE, F-38000 Grenoble, France
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Zhang, Tong,Price, Stephen,Ju, Lili,et al. A comparison of two Stokes ice sheet models applied to the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for plan view models (MISMIP3d)[J]. CRYOSPHERE,2017,11(1):179-190.
APA Zhang, Tong.,Price, Stephen.,Ju, Lili.,Leng, Wei.,Brondex, Julien.,...&Gagliardini, Olivier.(2017).A comparison of two Stokes ice sheet models applied to the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for plan view models (MISMIP3d).CRYOSPHERE,11(1),179-190.
MLA Zhang, Tong,et al."A comparison of two Stokes ice sheet models applied to the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for plan view models (MISMIP3d)".CRYOSPHERE 11.1(2017):179-190.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace