| 康德与施莱尔马赫至善学说评析; Comments on Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Schleiermacher's Categorical Imperative | |
| Zhang HY(张会永) ; ZHANG Hui-yong | |
| 2013-06 | |
| 关键词 | 康德 Immanuel Kant 施莱尔马赫 Friedrich Schleiermacher 德性 virtue 幸福 happiness 至善 categorical imperative |
| 英文摘要 | 张会永，厦门大学哲学系副教授，哲学博士。; 【中文摘要】至善问题或者说德性与幸福的关系问题，是康德和施莱尔马赫伦理学所关注的核心问题，而二人对该问题的看法却迥然不同。康德论证了德性和幸福虽然具有不同性质，但是仍然 可以作为至善的两个要素达到协调一致。施莱尔马赫严厉地批判了康德把二者联结起来的做法。 他认为德性与幸福是相互冲突的，至善只有排除经验性的幸福要素，与道德法则相一致，才能真正有意义。康德和施莱尔马赫的至善学说都既有深刻的洞见，又有明显的缺陷，比较二人观点的得失对于我们重新思考德性与幸福的关系具有重要的借鉴意义。 【Abstract】Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Schleiermacher thought very differently about the categorical imperative, or the relation between virtue and happiness, which is the central? concern in the ethics of Kant and Schleiermacher. Kant argues that virtue and happiness, though different in nature, can be coordinated as two elements of the categorical imperative. This view is harshly criticized by Schleiermacher who believes that virtue and happiness are mutually exclusive and only when it is aligned with virtue and insulated from experimental happiness, can the categorical imperative be meaningful. Both of their theories of the categorical imperative are insightful but apparently flawed. This paper argues that a comparison of the merits and demerits of their viewpoints will be helpful in our efforts to rethink the relationship between virtue and happiness.; 教育部人文社科青年基金项目“通向至善之途——德国古典伦理学中的德福之辩及其现代启示 (13YJC720047) |
| 语种 | 中文 |
| 出版者 | 厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）编辑部 |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/94118]  |
| 专题 | 2013年 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 张会永,ZHANG Hui-yong. 康德与施莱尔马赫至善学说评析, Comments on Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Schleiermacher's Categorical Imperative[J],2013. |
| APA | 张会永,&ZHANG Hui-yong.(2013).康德与施莱尔马赫至善学说评析.. |
| MLA | 张会永,et al."康德与施莱尔马赫至善学说评析".(2013). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论