QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	南(中国)海争端潜在替代方案之分析; Potential Alternatives to the Disputes in the South China Sea:An Analysis
	高世明 ; Shih-Ming Kao ; Nathaniel S. Pearre
	2013-06-30
关键词	南(中国)海 South China Sea 临时安排 Provisional arrangement 共同开发 Joint development 区域合作 Regional cooperation 公域 Commons
英文摘要	*高世明,博士,台湾海洋大学海洋事务与资源管理研究所助理研究员。电子邮箱:kaosm@mail.nsysu.edu.tw。**NathanielS.Pearre,特拉华大学地球、海洋和环境学院海洋科学和政策系。; ［文摘］本文的目的是分析和提出解决南(中国)海主权争端僵局的潜在替代方案。该地区的背景和现状表明,主权争端不太可能在可预见的未来得到解决。基于国际法的传统争端解决机制,包括外交谈判和第三方仲裁,尽管被许多外交官和学者所推荐,但至少在不久的将来不太会在南(中国)海起到作用。由于在贯彻实施这些机制方面可能存在的困难,油气储备“共同开发冶以及海洋环境和共享资源“区域合作冶被提了出来,作为规避这些主权争端的备选方案。然而,本文认为,油气储备的共同开发在不久的将来同样不太可能起到作用,因为它也有与传统机制同样的弱点,任何解决方案都可能受到主权的影响。另一方面,合作已被公认为国际法和国际关系中的一个必要和基本原则,加之周边各方根据《联合国海洋法公约》和许多其他国际环境公约做出了许多“公域冶合作的法律承诺,该地区有关公域的一些合作活动通常都是在双边或多边的基础上 开展的。尽管在最终解决主权争端上没有进展,但对所有相关国家而言,在不久的将来,南(中国)海的区域合作也许是一种可行的替代方案。一如既往,所有各方的政治意愿对这种努力的成功是至关重要的。［Abstract］The purpose of this article is to analyze and propose potential alternatives to the stalemate of sovereignty disputes in the South China Sea.The background and status quo in the region suggest that sovereignty disputes are not likely to be settled in the foreseeable future.Although recommended by many diplomats and scholars,traditional dispute settlement mechanisms under international law,including diplomatic negotiation and third-party arbitration,will not likely work in the South China Sea,at least in the near future.Due to the probable difficulties in implementing either of the mechanisms,“joint development”of oil and gas reserves and“regional cooperation”on the marine environment and shared resources have been recommended as alternatives to circumvent these sovereignty disputes.Nevertheless,this article finds that joint development of oil and gas reserves is similarly unlikely to work in the near future because it suffers the same weakness as traditional mechanisms,in that any resolution may have sovereignty implications.On the other hand,cooperation has been recognized as a necessary and fundamental principle in international law and international relations.In addition,there are many legal commitments by bordering States/regions to cooperate on the commons under United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and many other international environmental conventions.Some cooperative activities related to the commons are regularly carried out on bilateral or multilateral bases in the region.Notwithstanding the lack of progress toward final settlement of sovereignty disputes,regional cooperation in the South China Sea may be a workable alternative for all States concerned in the near future.As always,the political will of all parties is paramount to the success of such an endeavor.
语种	中文
出版者	《中国海洋法学评论》编辑部
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/75053]
专题	2013年卷第1期(Vol.2013 No.1)
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	高世明,Shih-Ming Kao,Nathaniel S. Pearre. 南(中国)海争端潜在替代方案之分析, Potential Alternatives to the Disputes in the South China Sea:An Analysis[J],2013.
APA	高世明,Shih-Ming Kao,&Nathaniel S. Pearre.(2013).南(中国)海争端潜在替代方案之分析..
MLA	高世明,et al."南(中国)海争端潜在替代方案之分析".(2013).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。