题名 | 强制赔礼道歉的合宪性研究; Study on the Constitutionality of Compulsory Apology in Laws |
作者 | 李楠 |
答辩日期 | 2013 ; 2012 |
导师 | 朱福惠 |
关键词 | 强制赔礼道歉 不表意自由 思想自由 良心自由 羞辱性制裁 Compulsory Apology The Right Not to Speak Freedom of Thought and Conscience Shaming Sanction |
英文摘要 | 强制赔礼道歉是否合宪,尚且未受到学者们的广泛关注,相关文献也仅局限于讨论民法上强制赔礼道歉的合宪性,未针对刑法上强制赔礼道歉的合宪性深入讨论。理论学界虽然陆续有著文评释者,但仍未说明不表意自由与思想良心自由的关系,以及强制赔礼道歉究竟是否侵害加害人的不表意自由或思想良心自由。本篇论文将以强制赔礼道歉的具体判例为切入点,先梳理在理论和实务界中关于强制赔礼道歉的合宪性的争议点,再从宪法比例原理的角度审查民、刑法上强制赔礼道歉的规定是否合宪,最后探讨审查强制赔礼道歉的合宪性之标准。笔者认为,所谓的“强制赔礼道歉”只需要求加害人为“形式意义的道歉”,不必要求加害人打心底表示抱歉。但是,无论是采取真挚道...; The constitutionality of compulsory apology has not received great attention in academia. Although some have discussed this issue, they mainly focused on the constitutionality of compulsory apology in the civil law, rather than in the criminal law. Previous literature did not figure out the relationship between freedom not to speak and freedom of conscience, and whether compulsory apology really i...; 学位:法律硕士; 院系专业:法学院法律系_法律硕士(JM); 学号:13020091150283 |
语种 | zh_CN |
出处 | http://210.34.4.13:8080/lunwen/detail.asp?serial=36048 |
内容类型 | 学位论文 |
源URL | [http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/23637] |
专题 | 法学院-学位论文 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 李楠. 强制赔礼道歉的合宪性研究, Study on the Constitutionality of Compulsory Apology in Laws[D]. 2013, 2012. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论