| 马一浮、牟宗三对朱熹“性即理”的不同解读; The Different Interpretations on Zhu Xi's “Nature Is Li”between Ma Yifu and Mou Zongsan | |
| 乐爱国 ; 李志峰 | |
| 2015-01-15 | |
| 关键词 | 马一浮 牟宗三 朱熹 “性即理” “心即理” Ma Yifu Mou Zongsan Zhu Xi "Nature is Li" "Mind is Li" |
| 英文摘要 | 现代对于朱学与陆王学的研究,大都以“性即理“与“心即理“区分朱学与陆王学,并将二者对立起来,把朱学界定为“理学“,把陆王学界定为“心学“。与此不同,一些学者反对把“性即理“与“心即理“对立起来,甚至通过强调二者的相互联系,把朱学与陆王学调和起来。马一浮虽强调“性即理“与“心即理“的不同,但是以朱熹“性即理“涵摄“心即理“。牟宗三则通过分析朱熹“性即理“与陆王“心即理“的截然不同,并以为“朱子实非孟子学“。这些莫衷一是的学术观点是进一步研究朱熹“性即理“及其与陆王“心即理“之关系的学术基础和可供参考的学术资源。; Modern studies on philosophical thoughts between Zhu Xi School and Lu Jiuyuan-Wang Shouren School often distinguish their view s in the fact that the former holds "Nature is Li"while the latter calls for "Mind is Li".However,it was opposed by other scholars who emphasize the non-opposition and unity of their thoughts in general,thus putting them in a harmonious manner.Ma Yifu,on one hand,stresses learning differences between two disciplines,while on the other thinks the proposition "Nature is Li"contains the proposition"Mind is Li".On the contrary,Mou Zongsan believes that Zhu Xi's philosophical thought is not the orthodox of Mencius' philosophy.In a word,such debates are of great significance to the study of Neo-Confucianism.; 教育部哲学社会科学重大课题“百年朱子学研究精华集成”(12JZD007)的研究成果 |
| 语种 | zh_CN |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/118172]  |
| 专题 | 人文学院－已发表论文 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 乐爱国,李志峰. 马一浮、牟宗三对朱熹“性即理”的不同解读, The Different Interpretations on Zhu Xi's “Nature Is Li”between Ma Yifu and Mou Zongsan[J],2015. |
| APA | 乐爱国,&李志峰.(2015).马一浮、牟宗三对朱熹“性即理”的不同解读.. |
| MLA | 乐爱国,et al."马一浮、牟宗三对朱熹“性即理”的不同解读".(2015). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论