| 语境主义的异议与辩护; Objections to and Defense of Contextualism | |
| 曹剑波 | |
| 2014-01-15 | |
| 关键词 | 语境主义 怀疑主义难题 反语境主义 contextualism skeptical problem anti-contextualism |
| 英文摘要 | 语境主义是现有解答怀疑主义难题中最合理的理论。然而,对于语境主义解答方案,许多知识论者提出了各种不同的异议。这些异议概括地说有来自无用论的异议、来自缺陷论的异议和来自替代论的异议。分析发现反语境主义者对语境主义的批判要么是误解的,要么是无关痛痒的,要么是可辩解的。因此,虽然语境主义有需要修正之处,但是说“语境主义仍是现有解答怀疑主义难题中最合理的理论“是成立的。; Contextualism is the most reasonable theory to resolve skeptical problems.However,a lot of epistemologists have raised a variety of objections to contextualist answers.These objections include the objections from uselessness,defects and alternative theories.After analyzing these objections,it is easy to find that the anti-contextual objections to contextualism are either misunderstood,or irrelevant,or rebuttable.Thus,although the contextualism still need improving,the statement that contextualism is still the most reasonable theory to resolve skeptical problems now is still true.; 福建省教育科学“十二五”规划常规课题重点项目“道德教育的实验哲学研究”(FJCGZZ12-003); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“实验哲学”(2012221003); 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划“实验知识论”(NCET-11-0290) |
| 语种 | zh_CN |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/117964]  |
| 专题 | 人文学院－已发表论文 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 曹剑波. 语境主义的异议与辩护, Objections to and Defense of Contextualism[J],2014. |
| APA | 曹剑波.(2014).语境主义的异议与辩护.. |
| MLA | 曹剑波."语境主义的异议与辩护".(2014). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论