QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	试析历史表现与认知的关系——兼论安克斯密特与扎密托的争论; Relationship between Historical Representation and Cognition:With Reconsideration of the Controversy between Ankersmit and Zammito
	王志华
	2011
关键词	历史表现与历史认知 安克斯密特 扎密托 指称 关于 主体间性 historical representation and cognition Ankersmit Zammito reference aboutness inter-subjectivity
英文摘要	安克斯密特认为历史表现与认知的关系分两个方面,在陈述句子层面有指称;在叙述文本的层面则无指称,而仅仅是“关于“历史实在。扎密托对安克斯密特的文本无指称理论提出了异议,认为主体间的共识可以成为叙述文本的指称。其实,扎密托混淆了自然科学与史学,主体间的共识标准也和当下的史学实践相左,因此其观点和立论均不成立。; Ankersmit asserts that each singular sentence contained by a historical representation which is constituted by a set of sentences has a reference in historical reality while the whole text which has no counterpart in historical reality is just "about" it.Zammito argued against Ankersmit's opinion that historical text on the whole has no reference for inter-subjective acceptability could be its reference.However,Zammito confuses natural science and historical representation,the standard of inter-subjective acceptability runs counter to contemporary historical practice.Accordingly,Zammito's theory is inconsistent and unacceptable.
语种	zh_CN
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/116661]
专题	人文学院－已发表论文
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	王志华. 试析历史表现与认知的关系——兼论安克斯密特与扎密托的争论, Relationship between Historical Representation and Cognition:With Reconsideration of the Controversy between Ankersmit and Zammito[J],2011.
APA	王志华.(2011).试析历史表现与认知的关系——兼论安克斯密特与扎密托的争论..
MLA	王志华."试析历史表现与认知的关系——兼论安克斯密特与扎密托的争论".(2011).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。