QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	偏正顺序的判断标准和认知理据; The Standards for Judging Modifier and the Cognitive Grounds in Them
	罗春英
	2011
关键词	逆序 判断标准 认知 同素异序 reverse order judging standard cognition same morpheme but different orders
英文摘要	学者们所争议的逆序词,运用两个标准即可准确判断:第一,哪一个语素的修饰、限定功能更明显;第二,整个词义接近第一个语素还是第二个语素。无论前偏后正还是逆序词,有两种认知理据贯穿其中:从大单位到小单位的认知顺序;从具体到抽象的认知习惯。认知顺序中隐含着中国人的传统哲学理念,因而具有稳定性。认知习惯具有地方差异性,因而更容易产生同素异序词。; The words with reverse order under the dispute of scholars could be judged accurately by the application of two standards.First,which morpheme has more apparent function of modification or restriction? Second,does the whole meaning of the word get closer to the first morpheme or the second one? Whatever it is the word with modifier ahead or the word with reverse order,two cognitive grounds are covered in them,that is,the cognitive order from big unit to small unit and the cognitive habit from concretion to abstract.There hides the traditional philosophic concept of Chinese people in cognitive order,so it has the feature of stableness.The cognitive habits get changed in different areas,so it causes the appearance of words with the same morpheme but different orders easier.
语种	zh_CN
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/116613]
专题	人文学院－已发表论文
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	罗春英. 偏正顺序的判断标准和认知理据, The Standards for Judging Modifier and the Cognitive Grounds in Them[J],2011.
APA	罗春英.(2011).偏正顺序的判断标准和认知理据..
MLA	罗春英."偏正顺序的判断标准和认知理据".(2011).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。