QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	“韦柳体”及韦柳高下争议的接受学考察; On "Wei-Liu Style" and the Dispute of Wei and Liu's Artistic Status in Acceptive Esthetics
	洪迎华
	2010
关键词	韦应物 柳宗元 韦柳体 接受学 Wei Yingwu Liu Zongyuan Wei-Liu's style acceptive esthetics
英文摘要	苏轼以陶渊明、韦应物、柳宗元三者比较的方式对韦柳诗歌简古淡远的共性风格进行揭示,严羽则用“韦柳体“之名将其确认为一个诗歌体派。在接受学意义上,“韦柳体“的提出,一是缘于宋人对陶渊明诗歌和人格的推崇,韦、柳皆因有陶诗意趣而被并论;二是因为韦、柳在五言古诗上的创作成就。苏轼在陶、韦、柳三者高下的比较中,认为柳胜韦,此一论断在明清时期引起了普遍的质疑。清代王士祯将矛头直接指向苏轼,明确提出韦在柳之上,为韦柳高下的问题翻案,产生了很大影响。对于这种争议,除了要深切了解论者的立场和用意,深入作品、具体辨析韦柳风貌及艺术渊源、淡化和规避无谓的高下之争才是关键。; After Su Shi had explained the light and simple style of Wei Yingwu and Liu Zongyuan's poem by comparing them with Tao Yuanming,Yan Yu used the words of "Wei-Liu style" to describe it as a special style.In the perspective of acceptive esthetics,the advocation of the style had two reasons.One was the Song poets' high esteem to Tao Yuanming's poetry and personality,and Wei and Liu were regarded as having the spirit of Tao's poem.The other was the creatiive achievement of Wei and Liu in five-character ancient poems.Su Shi thought that Liu was superior to Wei in the artistic achievement,which caused universal question in the Ming and Qing dynasties.The critic Wang Shizhen of the Qing dynasty offered the opposite comment against Su Shi's judgment,which had had a very tremendous influence.Apart from strengthening the understanding of the standpoints and intentions of the critics,it is of great improtance to thoroughly study the work of Wei an Liu,and weaken and avoid the meaningless dispute.; 国家社会科学基金项目“元和诗歌双向接受史的文化学考察”(01BZW018)
语种	zh_CN
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/115953]
专题	人文学院－已发表论文
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	洪迎华. “韦柳体”及韦柳高下争议的接受学考察, On "Wei-Liu Style" and the Dispute of Wei and Liu's Artistic Status in Acceptive Esthetics[J],2010.
APA	洪迎华.(2010).“韦柳体”及韦柳高下争议的接受学考察..
MLA	洪迎华."“韦柳体”及韦柳高下争议的接受学考察".(2010).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。