| 律师参与刑事诉讼:历史解释与现状审视; Lawyers' Participation in Criminal Proceedings:Historic Explanations and Assessment | |
| 陆而启 ; 王铁玲 | |
| 2015-06-28 | |
| 关键词 | 律师化 对抗式 审辩冲突 lawyers' orientation conflict-type trial dispute |
| 英文摘要 | 随着律师在刑事诉讼中的作用加强,原先刑事诉讼中存在的所谓检警摩擦和检法冲突逐渐消退并为审辩冲突取代,而面对严惩死磕派律师或者把律师的权利关进规范的笼子等观点,通过梳理英美律师参与刑事诉讼的历史可以发现,诉讼模式的变革是因为律师化的一个结果。程序技术要求律师参与,律师参与改变诉讼程序,程序制度因为律师作用的强化而互动发展成控辩对抗式诉讼。律师参与诉讼有互动和互补的双重原理,而律师在我国刑事诉讼真正有效地发挥作用的领域包括事实认定和法律适用两个方面,由此重申,对抗式诉讼的本质主要表现为,对抗源于不满又吸收不满,对抗要求平等又促成平等。; With the increasing role of lawyers in criminal proceedings,the once- existing conflicts between procuratorate and police and between procuratorate and court are replaced by trial disputes.Through an examination of British and American lawyers' participation in criminal proceedings,we can find that the proceeding model reform is an outcome of lawyers' orientation.It is argued that lawyers' participation is useful for interaction and complementation,and that lawyers can play an active role in China in fact- identification and law applicability.It is reiterated that the nature of conflict- type proceedings is dissatisfaction and urge for equality.; 2014年度福建省社会科学规划一般项目“刑事诉讼的律师化研究”[项目编号:2014B235]; 福建省法学会2014年度法学研究重点课题“公正审判的意见解构”[编号:FLS(2014)A02] |
| 语种 | zh_CN |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/100496]  |
| 专题 | 法学院－已发表论文 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 陆而启,王铁玲. 律师参与刑事诉讼:历史解释与现状审视, Lawyers' Participation in Criminal Proceedings:Historic Explanations and Assessment[J],2015. |
| APA | 陆而启,&王铁玲.(2015).律师参与刑事诉讼:历史解释与现状审视.. |
| MLA | 陆而启,et al."律师参与刑事诉讼:历史解释与现状审视".(2015). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论