法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用; The Redemption by Jurisprudence: The Application of the Reciprocity Rationale to Regulatory Impostion Cases | |
刘连泰 | |
2015-07-15 | |
关键词 | 法理 互惠原理 平均利益互惠 管制性征收 jurisprudence reciprocity rationale average reciprocity of advantage regulatory imposition |
英文摘要 | 政府管制的利益不可能匀质分布,很容易遭到管制性征收规则的阻遏。互惠原理可以适当磨平征收规则的刚性棱角,在法理上扮演救赎的角色。互惠原理在美国经历了经济互惠和社会互惠两个阶段,分别形成各自的规则。北京的汽车单双号限行常态化措施符合社会互惠原理,不构成管制性征收。; The benefit of government regulation cannot be distributed homogeneously,which is easily prevented by the rules of regulatory imposition.The reciprocity rationale can properly soften the rules of imposition,where the Jurisprudence plays a redemptive role.The Reciprocity Rationale in America has been through two stages-economic reciprocity and social reciprocity,which separately form its own rules.The normalization of even-odd license plate method in Peking is consistent with the rationale of social reciprocity,and thus does not constitute a regulatory imposition. |
语种 | zh_CN |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/100439] ![]() |
专题 | 法学院-已发表论文 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 刘连泰. 法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用, The Redemption by Jurisprudence: The Application of the Reciprocity Rationale to Regulatory Impostion Cases[J],2015. |
APA | 刘连泰.(2015).法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用.. |
MLA | 刘连泰."法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用".(2015). |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论