QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用; The Redemption by Jurisprudence: The Application of the Reciprocity Rationale to Regulatory Impostion Cases
	刘连泰
	2015-07-15
关键词	法理 互惠原理 平均利益互惠 管制性征收 jurisprudence reciprocity rationale average reciprocity of advantage regulatory imposition
英文摘要	政府管制的利益不可能匀质分布,很容易遭到管制性征收规则的阻遏。互惠原理可以适当磨平征收规则的刚性棱角,在法理上扮演救赎的角色。互惠原理在美国经历了经济互惠和社会互惠两个阶段,分别形成各自的规则。北京的汽车单双号限行常态化措施符合社会互惠原理,不构成管制性征收。; The benefit of government regulation cannot be distributed homogeneously,which is easily prevented by the rules of regulatory imposition.The reciprocity rationale can properly soften the rules of imposition,where the Jurisprudence plays a redemptive role.The Reciprocity Rationale in America has been through two stages-economic reciprocity and social reciprocity,which separately form its own rules.The normalization of even-odd license plate method in Peking is consistent with the rationale of social reciprocity,and thus does not constitute a regulatory imposition.
语种	zh_CN
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/100439]
专题	法学院－已发表论文
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	刘连泰. 法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用, The Redemption by Jurisprudence: The Application of the Reciprocity Rationale to Regulatory Impostion Cases[J],2015.
APA	刘连泰.(2015).法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用..
MLA	刘连泰."法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用".(2015).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。