| 美国法上的幌子征收及其启示; Pretextual Takings in American Law and its Enlightenments | |
| 刘玉姿 | |
| 2013-10-15 | |
| 关键词 | 幌子征收 凯洛案 公用标准 pretextual taking the Kelo case public standard |
| 英文摘要 | 幌子征收系指政府打着公共利益的旗号,实则是为了私人利益而进行的征收。美国联邦最高法院的凯洛案判决使得幌子问题重新回归征收领域,凯洛案后的一系列判例则进一步发育出明确的幌子征收识别标准,使得作为征收理由渐趋虚置的公用标准焕发生机。美国法上的幌子征收理论对于解决同样困扰中国征收领域的幌子问题有着借鉴意义。; When the government uses public benefit as a pretext,but actually pursues private purpose,the pretextual taking happens.Through the Kelo case of the Federal Supreme Court,the pretextual taking came back to the taking field.The cases following the Kelo goes even further,which inspire several specific standards of identification,and revive the public standard.The theory of pretextual takings in American law is a mirror for China to deal with its pretext problem of takings. |
| 语种 | zh_CN |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/100111]  |
| 专题 | 法学院－已发表论文 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 刘玉姿. 美国法上的幌子征收及其启示, Pretextual Takings in American Law and its Enlightenments[J],2013. |
| APA | 刘玉姿.(2013).美国法上的幌子征收及其启示.. |
| MLA | 刘玉姿."美国法上的幌子征收及其启示".(2013). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论