CORC  > 厦门大学  > 法学院-已发表论文
论我国多数人之债的完善——以不可分之债与连带之债的区别为中心; On the Improvement of the Obligation of Plurality of Subjects——From the viewpoint of the differences between indivisible obligation and solidary obligation
齐云
2012
关键词不可分之债 连带之债 债的标的 债的主体 indivisible obligation solidary obligation object of obligation subject of obligation
英文摘要不可分之债是从债的标的(给付)的角度对债的一种观察,连带之债却是从债的主体关系的角度对债的另一种观察,它们在划分标准、形成原因、功能目的、损害赔偿之债的性质、可继承性、整体履行的原因及方式方面存在明显不同。我国《民法通则》不当地将不可分之债并入到连带之债,只规定了按份之债和连带之债,与传统大陆法系大多数国家民法典的立法模式相悖,因而我国未来民法典应再增加可分之债和不可分之债这一分类,以填补法律的漏洞,从而明确地区别不可分之债和连带之债。; Indivisible obligation is characterized from the viewpoint of object of obligation,while solidary obligation is characterized from the viewpoint of subject of obligation: they are different in standards of division,reasons of formation,functions and purposes,natures of obligations for compensating the damage,inheritability or not,reasons and methods of payment for the whole.The Chinese general principles of civil law have incorporated the indivisible obligation into the solidary obligation,in which there are only partial obligation and solidary obligation,whose legal pattern is different to that of major countries of continental law system.In order to fill the legal loophole,in the Chinese future civil code a new classification,id est,divisible obligation and indivisible obligation,should be added,so that we can clearly distinguish the indivisible obligation and solidary obligation.; 2011年教育部青年项目《不可分之债研究——以我国多数人之债制度的完善为中心》(11YJC820094)阶段性研究成果
语种zh_CN
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/99845]  
专题法学院-已发表论文
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
齐云. 论我国多数人之债的完善——以不可分之债与连带之债的区别为中心, On the Improvement of the Obligation of Plurality of Subjects——From the viewpoint of the differences between indivisible obligation and solidary obligation[J],2012.
APA 齐云.(2012).论我国多数人之债的完善——以不可分之债与连带之债的区别为中心..
MLA 齐云."论我国多数人之债的完善——以不可分之债与连带之债的区别为中心".(2012).
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace