人造板甲醛散发量测试方法分析 | |
杜正健 ; 莫金汉 ; 张寅平 ; DU Zheng-Jian ; MO Jin-Han ; ZHANG Yin-Ping | |
2016-03-30 ; 2016-03-30 | |
关键词 | 甲醛散发 建材 标准方法 C-history 室内空气质量 formaldehyde emission building materials standard methods C-history indoor air quality X831 |
其他题名 | Different Test Methods on Formaldehyde Emission From Wood-Based Board |
中文摘要 | 人造板是室内甲醛的主要来源;测试其甲醛散发量有助于评估人造板对人体的健康影响。本文对比分析了常用的人造板甲醛散发量测试方法,包括穿孔法、广口容器法、干燥器法、气体分析法、气候箱法、FLEC法和C-history法等.穿孔法仅能获得人造板的甲醛总含量,而非总散发量;气候箱法测试结果能直接反映人造板的真实散发情况,但测试周期长,代价大;C-history方法采用密闭舱测试人造板散发关键参数,可预测人造板真实散发特性,缩短测试时间。此外,不同方法的预处理条件和测试条件明显不同,因此不同方法测试结果的相关性及其测试误差值得研究.; Determining formaldehyde emission from wood-based board is important for wood-based board is the main source of indoor formaldehyde,which affects people's health.This article presents a comprehensive comparison of commonly used test methods,including perforator method,flask method,desiccator methods,gas analysis method,chamber method,FLEC method and C-history method.The formaldehyde content measured by the perforator method is the total formaldehyde content,but not emittable formaldehyde.The chamber method can directly reflect the real emission characteristic of wood-based materials;however it is time and money-consuming.Using C-history method,the characteristic parameters of wood-based materials can be obtained simultaneously in short time,which can be used to predict the real emission.Besides,pre- and test conditions of these methods are different,this results in the need for comparing the agreement of these methods. |
语种 | 中文 ; 中文 |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://ir.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/ir/item.do?handle=123456789/145047] |
专题 | 清华大学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 杜正健,莫金汉,张寅平,等. 人造板甲醛散发量测试方法分析[J],2016, 2016. |
APA | 杜正健,莫金汉,张寅平,DU Zheng-Jian,MO Jin-Han,&ZHANG Yin-Ping.(2016).人造板甲醛散发量测试方法分析.. |
MLA | 杜正健,et al."人造板甲醛散发量测试方法分析".(2016). |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论