| 收入差距与刑事犯罪:基于不同犯罪类型的再考察 | |
| 陈春良 ; Chunliang CHEN | |
| 2016-03-30 ; 2016-03-30 | |
| 关键词 | 收入差距 刑事犯罪 双侧固定效应模型 Income Inequality Crimes Two-way Fixed Effect Model D917 |
| 其他题名 | Income Inequality and Crimes:a Re-investigation Based on Different Crime Types |
| 中文摘要 | 收入差距扩大强化了参与犯罪活动的激励;不同犯罪类型对收入差距扩大反应的敏感程度可能存在差别。基于一个全新的浙江省31个县1980~1989年间的面板数据,本文对收入差距扩大影响刑事犯罪的数量关系展开了详细的计量分析,并将分析的重点聚焦于国内已有研究较少涉及的犯罪类型区分上。双侧固定效应模型的估计结果显示,收入差距每上升1个百分点,平均而言将导致加总的刑事犯罪率增加0.19%。针对不同类型的刑事犯罪决定方程的估计发现,收入差距扩大对暴力犯罪的影响最大,接着依次是严重犯罪和一般刑事犯罪,侵财犯罪的影响相对较小。以上估计结果的直接政策蕴涵是,我国转型期犯罪治理需要重视不同犯罪类型的区别对待,并对地区所处发展阶段的不同特征仔细考量。; Widening income inequality and deteriorating labor market condition enhance the incentives to participate into criminal activities.However,the response of different offences to widening income inequality might be different Based on a new county panel from 1980 to 1989 of Zhejiang province with 31 counties,this paper estimates the impact of income inequality on crime rates.The results from the two- way fixed effect model show that one percent rise of income inequality will increase overall crime rates by 0.19%on average.And the estimates for different types of crimes indicate that the elasticity of violent crimes to income inequality is the biggest,with property crimes the least and serious crime and total crime rates laying somewhere in between.Direct implication of current study is that crimes distinction and developing stages difference should be taken into account and carefully studied in making anti-crime policy in transitional China. |
| 语种 | 中文 ; 中文 |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/ir/item.do?handle=123456789/143630]  |
| 专题 | 清华大学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 陈春良,Chunliang CHEN. 收入差距与刑事犯罪:基于不同犯罪类型的再考察[J],2016, 2016. |
| APA | 陈春良,&Chunliang CHEN.(2016).收入差距与刑事犯罪:基于不同犯罪类型的再考察.. |
| MLA | 陈春良,et al."收入差距与刑事犯罪:基于不同犯罪类型的再考察".(2016). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论