| 胺法脱碳系统模拟及吸收剂的选择 | |
| 朱迎新 ; 王淑娟 ; 赵博 ; 陈昌和 ; ZHU Yingxin ; WANG Shujuan ; ZHAO Bo ; CHEN Changhe | |
| 2010-06-08 ; 2010-06-08 | |
| 关键词 | CO_2脱除 甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA) 再沸器能耗 敏感性分析 CO_2 removal methyldiethanolamine(MDEA) reboiler duty sensitivity analysis X701 |
| 其他题名 | Simulation of a CO_2 capture system using amine solutions for selection of absorbents |
| 中文摘要 | 为了选择性能较好的脱除CO2的吸收剂,以一乙醇胺溶液(MEA)、二乙醇胺溶液(DEA)、甲基二乙醇胺溶液(MDEA)、2-氨基-2-甲基-1-丙醇溶液(AMP)为目标吸收剂,用Aspenplus软件模拟各种吸收剂吸收CO2的工况,比较相同条件下采用不同吸收剂的吸收率、能耗和吸收剂成本等参数。结果表明,在这4种吸收剂中,MDEA的运行成本最低,脱除CO2的能耗为3.01GJ.t-1、吸收剂成本为32.4元。还针对MDEA进行了敏感性分析,分别考察了入口吸收剂量、塔高和级数对吸收效果的影响,为相关参数的优化组合提供了初始数据。; Better CO2 absorbents are needed to more efficiently reduce CO2 emissions from power plants.Monoethanolamine(MEA),diethanolamine(DEA),methyldiethanolamine(MDEA) and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol(AMP) solutions were used to remove CO2 from the flue gas of a coal-fired power plant.The absorption-regeneration cycles were simulated using Aspen PlusTM to compare the performance of the solutions for the same conditions.The results show that MDEA solution is less expensive than the others.The reboiler for the MDEA based system requires 3.01 GJ per ton CO2 and the solvent cost is 32.4 RMB per ton CO2.A sensitivity analysis of the MDEA based system analyzed the influence of the solvent flow rate,packing height and number of segments. |
| 语种 | 中文 ; 中文 |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/50168]  |
| 专题 | 清华大学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 朱迎新,王淑娟,赵博,等. 胺法脱碳系统模拟及吸收剂的选择[J],2010, 2010. |
| APA | 朱迎新.,王淑娟.,赵博.,陈昌和.,ZHU Yingxin.,...&CHEN Changhe.(2010).胺法脱碳系统模拟及吸收剂的选择.. |
| MLA | 朱迎新,et al."胺法脱碳系统模拟及吸收剂的选择".(2010). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论