| 组合导航系统故障检测方法的比较研究 | |
| 刘国良 ; 张迎春 ; 强文义 ; 孙增圻 ; LIU Guo-liang ; ZHANG Ying-chun ; QIANG Wen-yi ; SUN Zeng-qi | |
| 2010-06-07 ; 2010-06-07 | |
| 关键词 | 故障检测方法 组合导航系统 模糊综合评价 fault detection methods integrated navigation system fuzzy comprehensive evaluation V249.328 |
| 其他题名 | Comparative Research on Fault Detection Methods for Integrated Navigation System |
| 中文摘要 | 对组合导航系统故障检测方法进行了对比研究。除介绍了χ2检验法、数据变化率检验法,还提出了一种基于模糊综合评价的故障检测方法。它以模糊综合评价算法为基础,对组合导航系统中的每个子系统的测量值进行综合判断,以确定该子系统的工作状态。最后,利用GPS/INS组合导航系统对上述三种故障检测方法进行了对比研究。实验结果表明,χ2检验法对于软故障不敏感,数据变化率检验法对连续长时间出现的故障无法判断。而基于模糊综合评价的故障检测方法针对具体的组合导航系统,通过适当调整参数,对所有类型的故障都能很好地检测。; The fault detection methods for integrated navigation systems are compared.The χ~2 test method and the judgment method of data change rate are presented,and a fault detection method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is proposed.The method comprehensively judged all the measured data of each subsystem in order to determine states of the subsystems.At last,the above three methods are compared in an experiment on a GPS/INS integrated navigation system.The results of the experiment shows that the χ~2 test method is not sensitive to soft-faults,the judgment method of data change rate could not judge continuous faults,and the method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation could judge all of faults by adjusting parameters properly for concrete integrated navigation systems.; 973国家重点基金资助项目(5131201-4) |
| 语种 | 中文 ; 中文 |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/45166]  |
| 专题 | 清华大学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 刘国良,张迎春,强文义,等. 组合导航系统故障检测方法的比较研究[J],2010, 2010. |
| APA | 刘国良.,张迎春.,强文义.,孙增圻.,LIU Guo-liang.,...&SUN Zeng-qi.(2010).组合导航系统故障检测方法的比较研究.. |
| MLA | 刘国良,et al."组合导航系统故障检测方法的比较研究".(2010). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论