| “清华简”武王所戡之“黎”应为“黎阳” | |
| 王鹏程 ; WANG Peng-cheng | |
| 2010-06-07 ; 2010-06-07 | |
| 关键词 | 戡黎 “清华简” “上博简” 《容成氏》 黎阳 K877 |
| 其他题名 | King Wen,King of the insurgency,"Lebanon" different-"Tsinghua Jane" King of the insurgency,"Lebanon" should be "Yang Li" |
| 中文摘要 | 究竟是"文王戡黎"还是"武王戡黎",千年以来一直是历史上悬而未决的一桩公案。最近公布的"清华简"公布了周武王八年征伐耆(qi即黎)国得胜回到周都,在文王宗庙举行"饮至"典礼上武王和周公致毕公的两首乐诗。李学勤先生认为,这为宋代儒生主张的"武王戡黎"提供了有力证据,从而也就推倒了《尚书》、《左传》、《史记》等书所记载的"文王戡黎"。而据"上博简"《容成氏》中的文武图商故事,应该是"文王戡黎"。笔者结合"清华简"、"上博简"中的《容成氏》、今本《竹书纪年》以及相关文献,提出"二次戡黎"说,即文王和武王都曾戡黎,但所戡之黎不同,"清华简"所载武王所戡之"黎"应为纣都朝歌附近之"黎阳"。; What is the "Emperor Wen Kan Li" or " Emperor Wu Kan Li",millennium has been the history of a legal case pending.Recently published "Tsinghua Jane," published eight years of Emperor Wu conquest Qi(qi or Lebanon) State win back all week,held in the King Wen Jongmyo "to drink" ceremony to King and the Duke of two Bi Gong Rebecca.Mr.Li Xueqin believe that this is the Song that scholars of " Emperor Wu Kan Li " provides strong evidence,and thus overturned the "Book of History","Zuo Zhuan","Historical Records" and recorded in the book " Emperor Wen Kan Li." According to "the Bamboo","Rong Cheng Shi" in the civil and military plans to the story,it should be " Emperor Wen Kan Li ".I combined "Tsinghua Jane" and "Bamboo" in "Rong Cheng Shi",today the "Bamboo Annals" and related literature,the "counter-insurgency Lebanon War," said that the Emperor Wen and Wang have Kan Li,but by Li Kan's different,"Tsinghua Jane" by Emperor Wu Kan Li contained in the "Lebanon" should be near the Chao Ge all the "Li-Yang." |
| 语种 | 中文 ; 中文 |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/44774]  |
| 专题 | 清华大学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 王鹏程,WANG Peng-cheng. “清华简”武王所戡之“黎”应为“黎阳”[J],2010, 2010. |
| APA | 王鹏程,&WANG Peng-cheng.(2010).“清华简”武王所戡之“黎”应为“黎阳”.. |
| MLA | 王鹏程,et al."“清华简”武王所戡之“黎”应为“黎阳”".(2010). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论