| 评杨大堉、胡肇昕补《仪礼正义》 | |
| 彭林 ; PENG Lin | |
| 2010-06-07 ; 2010-06-07 | |
| 关键词 | 胡培翚 《仪礼正义》 杨大堉 胡肇昕 HU Pei-hui, Ceremony and Rirual, YANG Da-yu, HU Zhao-xin B222 |
| 其他题名 | About the Supplements of Ceremony and Rirual by YANG Da-yu and HU Zhao-xin |
| 中文摘要 | 胡培翚《仪礼正义》是清代礼学研究的重要著作,历来受到好评。然而,《仪礼》17篇,胡培翚仅完成12篇即已去世,其余《士昏礼》、《乡饮酒礼》、《乡射礼》、《燕礼》、《大射礼》五篇12卷,乃是其门人杨大堉以及族侄胡肇昕所补,而学者多将两者混为一体。杨、胡所补部分的水准究竟如何,能否与胡培翚的原作匹配,事关对《仪礼正义》的整体评价。杨、胡补《仪礼正义》各篇存在违背胡培翚既定体例、排弃贾公彦之说、引用文献不当、失于截断、前后失照等比较突出的问题,其学术水准明显不如胡培翚原作,读者不可不明辨于此。; HU Pei-hui's Ceremony and Rirual is an essential work of etiquette research of the Qing dynasty. It was always praised highly in academic circles. However, HU Pei-hui just finished 12 sheets and passed away. The last 5 sheets 12 volumes like are written by his disciple YANG Da-yu and his nephew HU Zhao-xin. As scholars are not always distinguish this. What about their supplement standard? Can it match with the original? This related with the evaluation of the work . Their supplements exist such problems as: disobey HU Pei-hui's law and have unsuitable quotations, contradictions and so on. Their academic standard cannot compare with HU Pei-hui's original work obviously. Readers please notice this. |
| 语种 | 中文 ; 中文 |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/43745]  |
| 专题 | 清华大学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 彭林,PENG Lin. 评杨大堉、胡肇昕补《仪礼正义》[J],2010, 2010. |
| APA | 彭林,&PENG Lin.(2010).评杨大堉、胡肇昕补《仪礼正义》.. |
| MLA | 彭林,et al."评杨大堉、胡肇昕补《仪礼正义》".(2010). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论