CORC  > 清华大学
“儒林列传”与“汉学师承”——《汉学师承记》的修撰及汉宋之争
戚学民 ; QI Xue-min
2010-06-07 ; 2010-06-07
关键词江藩 阮元 《汉学师承记》 儒林传拟稿 JIANG Fan RUAN Yuan Han-Learning Masters of the Qing Dynasty Draft Biographies of Confucians K249
其他题名Why Did JINAG Fan Compile Records of Han-Learning Masters and Its Role in Scholars Controvesies Between Han-Learning and Song-Learning
中文摘要江藩撰写的《汉学师承记》历来被视为清代学术史的重要资料,但是在该书学术内涵的解读方面尚有待发之覆。此书的学术意义与作者的撰述动机密切相关。江藩撰写本书特别与阮元总辑《国史儒林传》一事有关,江氏的意图是要影响《国史儒林传》的编撰。由此江藩以正史的笔法和规模,在《汉学师承记》中构建了一个以“汉学”为正宗的清代儒学学术史,在此过程中他强化了汉宋门户之见,将主宋学者摒弃在外。正是因为其强烈的门户之见,《汉学师承记》才引起宋学者的激烈反对,但是因为具有正史的笔法和规模并得到阮元的支持,它得以对整个清代学术史的书写产生了巨大影响。; JIANG Fan's Records of Han-learning Masters of the Qing Dynasty is considered an important material of intellectual history and its academic significance needs further studies.Jiang's motive to compose this book,which is crucial to understand the the academic meaning of the work,is still questionable.This paper tries to reveal that JIANG's composition of Records of the Han-learning Masters of the Qing Dynasty was relevant to RUAN Yuan's compilation of Draft Biographies of Confucians in the Qing History and JIANG wanted to exert influence upon Yuan's task.So in Records of Han-learning Masters of the Qing Dynasty JIANG Fan constructed an outline of intellectual history of the Qing Dynasty which took Han-learning as authentic scholarship according to the style and scope of official history,during the composition he enhanced the contest between the Han-learning and Song-learning scholars.
语种中文 ; 中文
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/43656]  
专题清华大学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
戚学民,QI Xue-min. “儒林列传”与“汉学师承”——《汉学师承记》的修撰及汉宋之争[J],2010, 2010.
APA 戚学民,&QI Xue-min.(2010).“儒林列传”与“汉学师承”——《汉学师承记》的修撰及汉宋之争..
MLA 戚学民,et al."“儒林列传”与“汉学师承”——《汉学师承记》的修撰及汉宋之争".(2010).
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace