QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	论丁若镛对朱熹《中庸章句》心性说的批评
	彭林 ; PENG Lin
	2010-06-07 ; 2010-06-07
关键词	丁若镛 朱熹 心性说 郭店楚简 DING Ruo-yong ZHU Xi the theory of mind-nature Guodian Chu Bamboo Slips B244.7 B312
其他题名	On DING Ruo-yong's Criticisms upon the Theory of Mind-nature in the Textual Study of Zhong-yong Written by ZHU Xi
中文摘要	“天命之谓性,率性之谓道,修道之谓教”是《中庸》的纲领,涉及到性、命、道、教等心性说的一系列概念,历来受到研究者的重视。朱熹沉潜反复数十年,汇通诸家而成《中庸章句》,成就最为杰出。朝鲜学者丁茶山诘难朱熹的《中庸》心性说,提出了颠覆性的意见。今由郭店楚简《性自命出》、《尊德义》等篇出土文献,而知朱熹之说更接近于《中庸》的本义,二氏之争终于尘埃落定。; The guiding principle of the Doctrine of the Mean(《中庸》),so called "What Heaven confers is called the Nature;an accordance with this Nature is called the Dao(Way,道);the regulation of Dao is called Jiao (Education,教)",has constantly received the respect of the researchers because of its relation to such concepts of the theory of mind-nature(心性说) as Nature(性),Fate(命),Dao(道) and Jiao(Education).ZHU Xi,as an outstanding scholar,wrote the Textual Study of the Doctrine of the Mean(《中庸章句》) with great concentration after dozens of year's research.Ding Tasan, a scholar of the ancient Korea,rebuked ZHU Xi's theory of mind-nature and put forward the subversive point of view.Recently,according to the unearthed artifacts,e.g.Xingzimingchu(《性自命出》) and Zundeyi(《尊德义》) of Guodian Chu Bamboo Slips,we can conclude that ZHU Xi's theories is rather closer to the original meanings of the Doctrine of the Mean than Ding Tasan's.So the controversy between them ought to come to an end.
语种	中文 ; 中文
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/42236]
专题	清华大学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	彭林,PENG Lin. 论丁若镛对朱熹《中庸章句》心性说的批评[J],2010, 2010.
APA	彭林,&PENG Lin.(2010).论丁若镛对朱熹《中庸章句》心性说的批评..
MLA	彭林,et al."论丁若镛对朱熹《中庸章句》心性说的批评".(2010).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。