CORC  > 清华大学
犯罪构成四要件说的缺陷:实务考察
周光权 ; ZHOU Guang-quan
2010-06-04 ; 2010-06-04
关键词犯罪构成 四要件说 实质判断 阶层化 construction of crime doctrine of 4elements substantial judgment to some extent D924.11
其他题名Demerits of the Four Elements of Construction of Crime:An Operational Point of View
中文摘要从实务的立场上看,在我国处于通说地位的犯罪构成"四要件说"存在诸多弊端:其只能静止地看待犯罪成立的条件,无法展示定罪过程,难以对行为从不同侧面、不同层次进行反复推敲和检验;容易根据形式判断得出结论;不重视法益保护的观念;过于重视行为人的意思;不能妥善处理共犯论的问题;难以实现积极的一般预防。为回应司法实务的需要,使对犯罪的认定更为精准,对"四要件说"进行"阶层化"改造乃是大势所趋。; From the operational point of view,one can readily find the demerits of the doctrine of "four elements" of crime in the general part of China's criminal law:it merely considers the conditions of construction of crime with a static view and can hardly illustrates the process of criminalization,thus a behavior can hardly be inspected and determined from different sides and levels;a conclusion may be frivolously reached on formality-based judgment;it overlooks the notion of protection of legal rights;it pays too much emphasis on the intent of the actor;the issue concerning accomplices cannot be appropriately solved;and general active prevention can hardly be proceeded. To meet the requirement of judicial practice and criminalize the defendant accurately,we hold it a general trend that the doctrine of four elements should be modified "to some extent."
语种中文 ; 中文
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/34704]  
专题清华大学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
周光权,ZHOU Guang-quan. 犯罪构成四要件说的缺陷:实务考察[J],2010, 2010.
APA 周光权,&ZHOU Guang-quan.(2010).犯罪构成四要件说的缺陷:实务考察..
MLA 周光权,et al."犯罪构成四要件说的缺陷:实务考察".(2010).
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace