CORC  > 清华大学
侵权责任法应与物权法相衔接
崔建远 ; Cui Jianyuan
2010-06-04 ; 2010-06-04
关键词侵害物权 一般侵权行为 特殊侵权行为 侵权损害赔偿 侵权责任法 物权法 D923
其他题名Tort Liability Law Should be Connected with Property Law
中文摘要我国物权法第37条规定的侵害物权所生损害赔偿的请求权,不是物权请求权,也不宜作为物权请求权的从请求权,而应作为侵权损害赔偿请求权,有时适用于一般侵权行为场合,有时适用于特殊侵权行为场合,有时单独作为侵权损害赔偿的请求权基础,有时须与有关规定一起作为请求权基础。我国物权法第242条、第244条关于无权占有场合侵害物权所生损害赔偿的规定,可作为第37条的特别规定。我国制定侵权责任法必须注意与物权法第37条、第242条和第244条的规定相衔接。; The damage claim stipulated in 37th article of China's Property Law which come out of tort on property is not a property claim and should not be a sub-claim of property claim but should be considered as a damage claim based on tort. It applies to general tort context as well as some special tort context, and sometimes it can be applied as independent base of tort damage claim and in other cases can be a base combined with other stipulations. The 242nd and 244th articles of the said law can be considered as special regulation of 37th article. The promulgation of tort liability law must be reconciled with above-mentioned articles.
语种中文 ; 中文
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/34626]  
专题清华大学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
崔建远,Cui Jianyuan. 侵权责任法应与物权法相衔接[J],2010, 2010.
APA 崔建远,&Cui Jianyuan.(2010).侵权责任法应与物权法相衔接..
MLA 崔建远,et al."侵权责任法应与物权法相衔接".(2010).
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace